| | Folks, it is serious stuff about
Jane "I had to make unpopular decisions" Fernandes' true performance as
the Provost of Gallaudet University. Read!
1. The White House
asked the Office of Management and Budget to investigate if Gallaudet
uses federal funds according to expectations. They found that the
academics at Gallaudet is 'ineffective'. It is just another word for
disastrous!
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/summary.10003306.2005.html
2.
The Department of Education found that program goals were not achieved.
It is very powerful language. Mainstream media and the hearing world
must know it, they bite on stuff like that! Tell them! Tell the media, tell
Congress, tell everybody because it is the real issue! As soon as people
understand this, Fernandes will be unseated!
http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/2006plan/edlite-g5edagallaudet.html

When disaster hits More details -- NOT PERFORMING PROGRAMS: WHAT DOES NOT PERFORMING MEAN? The program
rating indicates how well a program is performing, so the public can see
how effectively tax dollars are being spent. ExpectMore.gov tells you
whether or not a program is performing. Programs categorized as NOT PERFORMING have ratings of Ineffective or Results Not Demonstrated. - Ineffective.Programs
receiving this rating are not using your tax dollars effectively.
Ineffective programs have been unable to achieve results due to a lack
of clarity regarding the program’s purpose or goals, poor management, or
some other significant weakness.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/notperform.html
| Assessment Year | 2005 |
|---|
| Assessment Rating | Ineffective |
|---|
| As. Action Scores | | Section | Score |
|---|
| Program Purpose & Design | 60% | | Strategic Planning | 75% | | Program Management | 67% | | Program Results/Accountability | 13% |
|
|---|
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/detail.10003306.2005.html
Look
at this abysmal score of 13%. If a student scores 13% in my class, I
talk to that student that there are grievous concern about
the performance. Is this right? Sure it is! But look, what happened to Jane? Her score of 13%
was praised as outstanding, and she was promoted to President!? Is this
not insane? Pinch me, please, if I am dreaming. A nightmare of the most
terrifying kind, huh? Please, Board of Trustees, wake up and restore
decency, at least a crumble of it, at Gallaudet University, and send
home this walking academic disaster, so that no more damage is
made! We would be grateful forever!
testing_the_truth
|
| | Posted 10/11/2006 6:57 AM - 55 views - 2 comments
- recommend
    - recs0
- give stars
- votes0
- share
- email
 - sent0
Give eProps or Post a Comment |