The Opera Ghost really existed. He was not, as was longed believed, a creature of the imagination of the artist… Yes, he existed in flesh and blood, although he assumed the complete appearance of a real phantom; that is to say, of a spectral shade.
If you’ve seen the play, as I have, this Phantom is well known for his obsessive attempts to destroy his very own love- the opera. And I believe this is what some supporters of the FSSA protests are doing. Through faceless, personal attacks on the public faces and names. Jane F. Fernandes. I. King Jordan. Paul Kelly. David King. Bloggers like myself and others who either support or oppose the FSSA movements.
Did you know that last year, the Washington Post shut down comments on their blog? Their ombudsman, Deborah Howell, wrote that Hack Abramoff made direct campaign contributions to both clients (without explicitly disclosing that he had indirectly done so through his clients). Her column generated so much spitfire that the editor had little choice but to rein in the personal attacks. Deborah Howell later wrote:
…. It is profoundly distressing if political discourse has sunk to a level where abusive name-calling and the crudest of sexual language are the norm, where facts have no place in an argument. This unbounded, unreasoning rage is not going to help this newspaper, this country or democracy.
Amazon, when first allowing anonymous reviews, eventually had its own D’oh moment when finally realizing that authors often had their friends rave about their books with five-star ratings. Today, Amazon reviewers now are given the option of validating their identity; readers obviously give more credence to real names (which translates into “real” opinions).
There are still times when anonymity does work. Anybody remember Deep Throat? I look at this picture of W. Mark Felt, now in his nineties, and shake my head in sheer amazement. How could he have been the source of such heated, endless dissension.. that went on for decades? Admittedly, some Watergate fanatics (like myself) somewhat wish that Deep Throat had never revealed his identity- precisely because the constant guessing made the scandal seem bigger than what it really was!
As you know, DeafDC.com generates quite a voluminous share of anonymous comments. Very few brave souls use their full names, for perfectly understandable reasons. Some use aliases whose familiar (and sometimes humorous) nuances we grow to embrace. And then, there’s rest who are just, well, anonymous. Going even further into that category, you will inevitably find the guy who just somehow cruised by, decided to leave a ‘what the hey’ liner, and never returns. Or the scared poster who thinks she could lose her job by leaving behind tellable signs. And finally, we come to the malicious phantoms.
Who was that shape in the shadows? Whose is the face in the mask?
Masquerade! Every face a different shade. Masquerade. Look around, there’s another mask behind you!
Although not at all my intent to sound didactic in this post, I will tell you that it is no fun being victimized by cyber-bullies. Anonymous commentors tend to be much more aggressive than their honest-and-open counterparts. Sometimes their commentary can erode away at the credibility built by the blogger- or even destroy it entirely. Why is this so?
This loathsome gargoyle, who burns in bell, but secretly yearns for heaven. Secretly… secretly…
My guess is, they’re all trying to be Phantoms of the Opera.
© Copyrighted material. This article cannot be copied, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of the author. As with every blog on this website, this blog does not reflect the opinion of DeafDC.com.
7 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



What the hey
Very well written and I am sad that not more people are posting comments. The anonymous comments that are filled with hate have no place in real discussions of any nature.
“Past the point of no return - no backward glances:
our games of make believe are at an end.
Past all thoughts of “if” or “when” -
no use resisting: abandon thought,
and let the dream descend.
Fear can turn to love; you’ll learn to see,
to find the man behind the monster:
this repulsive carcass, who seems a beast,
but secretly dreams of beauty.”
This was beautifully written, Julie. Thanks for making my morning!
I have experienced cyberbulling firsthand, even before the Galladuet protests and joining DeafDC.com. It is a problem; however, I think that DeafDC.com provides a safe harbor for intelligent debate.
Indeed, it’s a VERY interesting post! I enjoy reading it. Thank you!
I did a little research and learned something new today. “A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity.”
http://news.com.com/Create+an+.....22491.html
That’s a terrible law, the House version of the bill with the language “substantial emotional harm” would have been a better choice of words.
Suppose I said that someone’s vulgar language annoys me, does that obligate them by law to reveal themselves?
In any case, I doubt the government will have the time or resources to enforce this law.
Yup, it’s worded poorly and I am sure there’s a very slim (let’s say .05%) chance that the person will get in trouble for Internet annoying. I was surprised to find the law easily.
I do wonder about those anonymous messengers and I am sure everyone else does it too. Also, I wonder how a person who’s a victim of a stalker will be protected if he/she has to reveal his/her identity? It was my first thought when reading this post and prompted me to research on it.