Home

Advertisement

Customize
 
 
18 May 2008 @ 01:53 pm
What's in a work ethic?  
Reading my good buddy Surduspub's blog about his advisees who just graduated from college raised a troubling question in my mind....namely, where is the work ethic in today's youth?

William Safire, speechwriter during the LBJ years, first coined this wonderful alliteration that is often wrongly attributed to LBJ himself: "the nattering nabobs of negativism have formed their own 4-H club, the Hysterical Hypochondriac Hypocrites of History".  Nothing is more true today than that phrase.  The liberal masses have crammed down our throats this image of an America that must, at the expense of all others, prop up those who do not wish to work.  Now before you begin to burn me in effigy, hear me out as I lay out my defense of this statement.

SSI and SSDI were created to assist those truly in need of assistance in living.  Those downtrodden who, for few reasons they could control, were unable to find jobs to support their families, put food on their tables, and the like.  Today, it has grown into a massive black hole of "doleness", enabling hundreds of thousands of people to work part time at a job while earning money from the government for their disability, real or perceived.  

I personally know of many people fully capable of working fulltime, who would rather work 20 hours a week (or 25, whatever it is now) and then sit back and draw their SSI/SSDI.  It's a great scheme, isn't it? Work part-time for full time wages. If I didn't have a work ethic, I'd be signed up too, in a heartbeat.  But all it has done is simply make us enablers of those with no desire to work.  I'm not begrudging those who truly need help, more power to them.  But those who simply coast through school, becoming professional students so that they can continue to stay on the draw, or those who, such as some deaf people, are fully capable of working full time jobs and trying to work their way up the ladder to self-sufficiency, are an enormous drain on the system and horrible role models to boot.

Take me for example (my wife would say PLEASE take him):  I drew SSDI for two years while attending college.  Oooooh!  I'm a hypocrite!  Hold on a minute....I was attending Gallaudet University first at the time (name a more expensive place to live than Washington DC for a college student), applied for several jobs on campus, and was turned down.  Why? Here is what blows my mind, MY SIGNING WAS NOT "UP TO PAR", for at least one job, and the other had such a large number of applicants that I was lost in the pool (lab assistant, if I recall correctly, for the biology department).  So I got SSDI to reduce the burden on my middle class parents and allow me to have some money for expenses (HEY, beer is a legitimate expense in college, okay?)

Shortly after completing one full year at Gallaudet, I moved back to Kentucky and re-enrolled at Eastern Kentucky University and obtained a part-time job at a local grocery store.   Slowly but surely, after a few months, my hard work was rewarded and they offered me full time.  I snapped it up in a heartbeat, even though I was attending college full time as well, and I also immediately notified SSI and requested they stop payments to me.  I had a few sleepless nights between work and school work, but it was worth it.  In the space of 3 years, I graduated with not one, but two degrees, thanks to all those notetakers and interpreters who made classes easier to handle, as well as my hard work.  

Then came the hiring game in my field.  A deaf man in the Loss Prevention field? Never been done to anyone's knowledge before me.  Door after door was slammed in my face. I left the grocery business and went into the security field, closely related to my degrees.  I started out as an investigator for a company that had never done investigations before.  I helped build the program from the ground up in that company, starting out taking "lover's triangle" cases where one spouse suspected the other of cheating, then moving into background checks on applicants for our clients, undercover work in factories where the client suspected employees of stealing, doing drugs, etc., and then on into worker's compensation investigations.  The whole time I did this, I also worked on the weekends as a security guard at a client's McDonald's location.  My pay during those times?  $5.50/hour for guard work, and $6.50/hour for investigations.  

But I persevered, continuing to go out on interview after interview, only to have a door slammed in my face repeatedly.  One such company whom I won't name, but whose name rhymes with Hidelty Hinvestments, actually flat out refused to hire me for a distribution center guard job that did not require answering the phone, because I would not be able to work 3rd shift, in their opinion, which might require answering the phone once in a while (several different guards per shift, why cant' one of THEM answer the damn phone?).  When I pointed out that a reasonable accomodation would be to have me work 1st and 2nd shifts only, they stated it "would not be fair to other guards or applicants, we can't change the whole department just to make you happy".

But I soldiered on....Long story short, I ended up going into the retail Loss Prevention field, rising up as far as becoming a District Loss Prevention Manager for a Fortune 50 company, having 9 stores report directly to me, with 1300 employees in those stores, and sales in excess of $400 million dollars a year, and to top it all off, not only meeting my budget for losses, but actually obliterating it and doing better than my hearing peers while in a much tougher market than them.  Pretty daggone good, huh?  Now my question is this...

Why can't other disabled people show that kind of initiative?  I'll answer the question for you....Because they have NO INCENTIVE to, we have become such a government of enablers, that actually NOT working hard is rewarded.  They have become hypochondriacs to the medicine of free and easy money, they become hysterical if anyone suggests screwing with that money, and they have become the biggest hypocrites in history by suggesting that they are disabled and drawing off the dole, but bristling when someone calls them that, suggesting instead, the term "differently abled".  Talk about having your cake and eating it too...



 
 
( Post a new comment )
surduspub[info]surduspub on May 19th, 2008 02:50 pm (UTC)
Testify!
Testity, dude! Stand up and shout it from the mountaintops! Make sure you sign it too, lest you be accused of being an audist!

I personally know more than one person who went to collge, worked their tail off, graduated, and then took a nothing job with some crappy retail chain because they didn't want their SSI cut.

Oy vey.

SSI - Suddenly Sucking Independence
Surely Suffocating Initiative
[info]sojourner25 on June 6th, 2008 07:30 am (UTC)
Hi, its me "Sojourner"
I have a question before I comment some more, can you speak at all? I won't be against you at all... but to be honest, I'd use it in my argument.
By the way, your site is really interesting. Am gonna read more and comment more.

Ali-
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on June 6th, 2008 12:55 pm (UTC)
LOL, Yes, I can speak very clearly. I grew up hard of hearing (diagnosed at 4), lost the rest of my hearing around the age of 17 or so. I was the only deaf kid in the school system here, grew up in a time (the 70's) when teaching a hard of hearing child sign language was "verboten" (as the Germans say) because it might impair their ability to speak. My parents had no role models or peers with deaf children who could tell them "the doctor is NOT always right about that" and so forth. I don't blame my parents, they did what they thought was best and gave me every opportunity in the world to succeed (that they knew about). It's tough. As a parent now, I now understand what they must have gone through, the excruciating choices they had to make with very little guidance, etc.

But anyways...comment away, I don't censor unless the language is WHOLLY inappropriate. If it's appropriate to the context of the comment, then no problem. :-)

Fire away! And thanks for checking out my site, feel free to come by any time. Another site I recommend is SurdusPub's site (you can read him on my "Friends Page" or link up with him).
[info]sojourner25 on June 7th, 2008 06:52 am (UTC)
I know what u mean about how tough it is on parents with a deaf child. That is why we need to educate them with Deaf education, ASL, etc.
It must have been an experience for you growing up alone.

Now, with you being able to speak, it makes things easier for you at workplaces?

Personally, I can't speak anything right. My parents tried to raise me with hearing aids and speech therapy, etc but I gave my hearing aids to our pet (that dog really liked chewing on molds!) I also peed my pants in speech therapies just to get out. ha... I have no idea why I was very stubborn because I wasn't in a deaf school that time. Anyway, my parents just gave up and the first day I saw a room filled with Deaf people, I was drawn to it. Thank God it happened when I was still young (9 years old).

Now, when I work with hearing people, they usually choose me as the person to clean toliets, do hard work. First, it was a Mexican, but the second a Deaf person appears, they are the next - and final - target.

Similarly, when Iceberg pimped his own people (black women), it was considered a dumb thing to do. Them crying for justice and them hurting their own people. And that only revealed the injustice that occured during that time. So, that is what I see in Deaf people drawing from the govt. Iceberg created a space for himself, in the same way as a Deaf person creating a space for himself/herself rather from what they experience at workplaces, unless it is a Deaf spaced workplace.

-Ali
Thumpaflash[info]thumpaflash on June 8th, 2008 06:25 am (UTC)
Yes, it has mostly made things somewhat easier in the workplace. I still have to fight the common misconceptions people have, just like all deaf people do.

I don't know what work you do, and I am sorry to hear that you were relegated to such lowly, menial tasks. I still don't agree with your "space-creating" theory, but I now understand your rationale a little better.

I do agree that we must continue to educate, educate, educate regarding ASL being an option from day 1, but not the ONLY option.

Thanks for taking the time to comment, they are always welcome here. Please feel free to also have any of your friends come over and check out my blog.
 
 

Advertisement

Customize